
Photo by flickr/carf
Resources
Key documents
See also
- ODI Natural Resource Perspective 75- From supervising 'subjects' to supporting 'citizens': Recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa, February 2002
- Rural livelihoods, forest law and the illegal timber trade in Honduras and Nicaragua
A. Wells, F. Del Gatto, M. Richards, D. Pommier & A. Contreras-Hermosilla, Paper in the series 'Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods, CIFOR, Bogor, 2004.
- Reflections on the Social Dimensions of Verification in FLEGT processes
Thinkpiece by Marcus Colchester, Forest Peoples Programme (PDF, 144kb)
In the many debates on illegal logging, little has been heard
on the likely impact that proposed reforms to tackle illegality may have on the lives of the rural poor. In fact, there has been very
little experience of formal impact assessment of forest
sector verification systems to date. Developmental
impacts – the way that verification systems influence
the economic outcomes for small-scale operators and
forest-dependent people – appear to be particularly
poorly understood. This is because:
- Many of the verification systems are fairly recent and
their developmental impact is, as yet, undetermined;
- Impact assessment is complex and requires resources;
- Attribution of impacts to the verification system is not
always clear;
- In cases of low ownership (i.e. where verification
systems have been externally imposed), there may be
little interest in assessing impact.
VERIFOR is examining the developmental impacts of verification systems within the forest sector, looking at both the
direct impacts of the verification process itself, as well as those indirect impacts arising from the implementation of
verification. Such
impacts are clearly influenced by the policy and legal framework, the initial design of the verification system and the
way in which verification is carried out.
VERIFOR aims to identify a range of measures that can be adopted to minimise negative impacts, also looking at issues surrounding the
monitoring and evaluation of verification systems.
Key areas of debate
- see resources for full discussion
- Reconciling the interests of all stakeholders, in
ways that allow for clear and unambiguous objectives to be set.
- Considering the nature of the likely developmental impacts of a verification system and how these can be assessed so
there is some degree of confidence over attribution.
- Distinguishing which developmental impacts are due to the verification system, and which are due to the legal framework on which it is based.
| |
|